If you’re being migrated

CoConstruct is winding down. Buildertrend isn’t the only door.

You didn’t choose CoConstruct because it was the biggest. You chose it because it was built for custom homes, where the client picks every finish. That’s a narrower thing than a general contractor suite, and it’s worth keeping.

To be fair about it: Buildertrend is a genuinely capable product with a real support organisation behind it. If you’re running thirty-plus homes with office staff, it will probably suit you better than this will. This page is for the builders it’s too much for.

What usually goes wrong in the migration

Two things, from what builders describe. The pricing lands differently than expected once it’s tied to annual build volume. And the shape of the product is wider — more modules, more configuration, more surface to learn — which is an asset at scale and a tax when it’s you, a project manager, and a laptop.

If you’re happily on Buildertrend, stay. This is only worth reading if the quote made you wince or the tool feels heavier than the job.

What carries over cleanly

What doesn’t

Side by side, plainly

 HereThe big suites
Selections & approvalsCoreIncluded
Homeowner experienceThe starting pointA module
Works with no signalYes, genuinelyVaries
Estimating & biddingNot builtYes
Time trackingNot builtYes
Data importBy handAssisted
SupportOne person, who answersA team
PriceNot set — design partners freeQuoted on volume

The honest recommendation

Don’t migrate a job that’s halfway through. Put your next build in, run it in parallel for a month, and keep the old system open until you’re bored of checking it. If the homeowner side alone doesn’t save you a conversation a week, walk away and I’ll have learned something useful.

Before you commit either way

Tell me what you’re migrating.

How many homes, how far along, and what you can’t live without. If this is the wrong fit I’ll say so — I’d rather that than a bad first month.